Criterion 1

Score

Inventiveness
(25%)

• Demonstrates no originality or innovation in the idea/project presented.

• Demonstrates little originality or innovation in the idea/project presented.

• Demonstrates some originality or innovation in the idea/project presented.

• Demonstrates high level of originality or innovation in the idea/project presented.

• Demonstrates outstanding originality or innovation in the idea/project shown.

• Message is unclear and group shows little interest and enthusiasm

• Message is somewhat clear and group shows adequate enthusiasm and interest

• Message is reasonably clear \and group shows sufficient enthusiasm and interest

• Message is clear and group shows good interest and enthusiasm

• Message is clear and group shows great interest and enthusiasm

• Unable to explain how it works in a way that is understandable

• Able to explain how it works in a way that is understandable

• Able to explain how it works clearly in a proper order

• Able to explain how it works in a logical order with adequate transitions between major ideas

• Able to explain ideas in logical order with effective transitions between major ideas

• Visual aids are missing

• Visual aids are inadequate

• Visual aids are satisfactory

• Visual aids are effective

• Visual aids are effective and creative

Total score for criterion 1

/ 20

Criterion 2

Score

Scalability
(Breath of impact)
(25%)

• Idea/project does not solve any existing problem

• Idea/ project solves existing problem that is not significant

• Idea/ project solves existing problem that is either significant to a small group or less significant for majority of the people

• Idea/project solves existing problem that is somewhat significant and common

• Idea/project solves problem that is significant and common

• Not expandable

• Expandable to small degree or unlikely

• Expandable to some degree

• Expandable to large degree

• Expandable to global scale

• Does not articulate or understand the target audience due to insufficient research

• Partially articulates and shows limited understanding towards the target audience due to limited research

• Somewhat articulates and understands the target audience with some research

• Reasonably articulates and understands the target audience with some research

• Clearly articulates and understands target audience with extensive research

• Does not state the benefits and drawbacks of current solutions (if exist)

• Little information on the benefits and drawback of current solutions (if exist)

• Some information on the benefits and drawbacks of current solution (if exist)

• Sufficient information on the benefits and drawbacks of current solution (if exist)

• Sufficient

information on the benefits and drawbacks of current solution (if exist)

Total score for criterion 2

/ 20

Criterion 3

Score

Feasibility
(25%)

• Idea/project lacks relevance or focus

• Idea/project has little relevance or focus

• Idea/project has some relevance or focus

• Idea/project is adequately relevant and focused

• Idea/project is tightly focused and relevant

• Not practical and not workable

• Not practical but may work

• Practical to little extent with purpose and may work

• High possibility of being practical and workable

• Practical, purposeful and workable

• Presentation contains multiple fact errors

• Presentation contains some fact errors

• Presentation has little fact errors or omissions

• Major facts presented are accurate and generally complete

• Presentation contains accurate information with no fact errors

Total score for criterion 3

/ 15

Criterion 4

Score

Depth of impact (25%)

• Idea/project presented does not impact nor satisfy existing needs

• Idea/ project presented has little impact but does not satisfy existing needs

• Idea/project has some impact but satisfy little existing needs

• Idea/project is impactful and satisfy existing needs

• Idea/project is very impactful and improve lives for the better

• Presentation does not provide depth, wordy and unclear

• Presentation does not provide adequate depth, some parts may be words or unclear

• Presentation needs additional depth, somewhat clear and not too wordy

• Presentation provides adequate depth, generally clear and rather concise

• Presentation provides good depth and details, clear and concise

• Key details are omitted

• Key details are undeveloped

• Key details not fully developed

• Few key details are omitted and major ideas adequately developed

• Ideas are well developed and facts have adequate background 

Total score for criterion 4

/ 15

Please key in the total score for each criterion into the system to auto-generated the overall score.
Note:
Inventiveness: measure of creativity, originality and innovativeness

Scalability: measure of how the project can be expanded in scope to the society and world

Feasibility: measure of how practical and workable the project can be

Depth of impact: measure to what degree can the project last or positively impact a person’s life